UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-1903
ALLEN WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
ERIC T. ALLSBROOK; JAMES ASHCRAFT; HAROLD
BALDWIN; OTIS BARRINO; BETTY BOWDEN; PETER B.
BOWDEN; DAVID BURNS; SAMUEL D. BUTLER; WILBERT
BUTLER; ALFRED CAGLE; JAMES W. CALLAWAY; ELMER
CAPEL, JR; WILLIAM CATLIN; DARCY COLSON; GUY
R. DAVIS; THOMAS DAVIS; THOMAS DEBERRY; WILLIE
J. DOCKERY; WILLIE MAE GADDY; ALVESTER GOODE,
JR; CARL D. GODWIN; EVERITT L. GREEN; JAMES D.
GREENE; ROXANNE GULLEDGE; HERMAN HARRIS; ROY
D. HARRIS; THEODORE H. HORNE; JOSHUA L. HOUGH;
DAREN R. JACKSON; ERIC D. JACKSON; EMORY
JOHNSON, JR.; RICHARD LEAK, JR.; ANTONIO
LEGRANDE; JAMES D. LILLY; A. C. LITTLE; LAC
LITTLE; HENRY MALONE; GARY MCCORKLE, SR.;
BOBBY W. MCDONALD; RONNIE J. MEDLEY; SAMMY L.
MILLER; JAMES R. OWENS; TOMMY PEMBERTON;
CHARLES PEOPLES; REGINALD PHILLIPS; CYNTHIA M.
POWELL; ERNEST E. RICHARDSON; ELUARD ROBINSON;
MELVIN N. ROBINSON, JR.; ZACK RORIE, JR.;
BOBBY RUSHING; ARTHUR S. SCOTT, JR.; CHARLES
W. SMITH; ROBERT J. SMITH; HAROLD LEE
STURDIVANT; RICHARDO T. TEAL; HARVEY THOMAS;
JOHN T. TURNER, JR.; VALERIE L. TYSON; WILLIAM
WALL; MARLOWE A. WILLIAMS; RONNIE WILLIAMS;
WILLIE WILLIAMS, JR.; DAN MCCORD, JR.; ALL
PLAINTIFFS; LARRY E. CLEGG; MATT A. CLEGG,
Plaintiffs,
versus
ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:00-cv-00379-NCT)
Submitted: July 24, 2007 Decided: July 26, 2007
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberlee W. DeWitt, HUNTON &
WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Allen Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting defendant’s motion to compel enforcement of the parties’
settlement agreement. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Williams v. Aluminum Co. of Am., No. 1:00-
cv-00379-NCT (M.D.N.C. filed July 15, 2006; entered July 17, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -