UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7870
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner - Appellee,
versus
PAUL NAGY,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:98-HC-00951-BR)
Submitted: July 18, 2007 Decided: August 2, 2007
Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Nagy, Appellant Pro Se. Michael David Bredenberg, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Nagy appeals the district court’s order finding that
he continues to satisfy the criteria for commitment set forth at 18
U.S.C. § 4246 (2000) and continuing Nagy’s commitment to the
custody of the Attorney General. The record reveals that, upon
Nagy’s motion, the district court conducted a hearing pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (2000). At the hearing, Dr. Corcoran testified
that Nagy still suffered from delusional disorder, prosecutory
type, and that Nagy was not taking antipsychotic medication because
of side effects and Nagy’s refusal to take such medication. Dr.
Corcoran testified that Nagy’s release in the United States was not
advisable because his release would create a substantial risk of
danger to others or to others’ property. Following the hearing,
the district court issued an order stating that Nagy continues to
suffer from a mental disease or defect as a result of which his
release would create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another
person or serious damage to property of others. Accordingly, the
court ordered Nagy’s continued commitment to the custody of the
Attorney General.
Based on our review of the record, the district court did
not clearly err in its determination. We accordingly affirm the
decision of the district court. We deny the motion to expedite and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
- 2 -
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 3 -