UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7691
SHAKA ZULU ACOOLLA, a/k/a Thomas Jackson,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE, in his individual and
official capacities; GENE JOHNSON, in his
individual and official capacities; D. J.
ARMSTRONG, in his individual and official
capacities; LEWIS B. CEI, in his individual
and official capacities; D. MILLS, in his
individual and official capacities; VIRGINIA
STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS, sued in their
individual and official capacities; L. W.
HUFFMAN, sued in his individual and official
capacities; D. A. BRAXTON, sued in his
individual capacity; B. J. WHEELER, sued in
his individual capacity; LIEUTENANT PIEROTTI,
sued in his individual capacity; G. K.
WASHINGTON, sued in his individual and
official capacities; LIEUTENANT SEAY, sued in
his individual and official capacities; M. E.
HANKINS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; R. T. FRANCIS, Sergeant, sued in
his individual and official capacities; R. L.
ADDAMS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; B. BOOKER, sued in his individual
and official capacities; C. WINGFIELD, sued in
his individual and official capacities; L. T.
EDMONDS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; D. H. LEWIS, sued in his
individual and official capacities; SERGEANT
CATRON, sued in his individual and official
capacities; K. HARRISON, sued in his
individual and official capacities; LIEUTENANT
TERRY, in his individual, and official
capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER TERRY, sued
in his individual and official capacities; T.
E. BRIGGS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; L. M. SAUNDERS, sued in his
individual and official capacities; L. R. DAY,
sued in his individual and official
capacities; T. T. REDMAN, sued in his
individual and official capacities; D. PULTZ,
sued in his individual and official
capacities; T. LAWHORN, sued in his individual
and official capacities; LIEUTENANT DEOLY,
sued in his individual and official
capacities; G. S. DEFIBAUGH, sued in his
individual and official capacities; T. C.
ROVELLI, sued in his individual and official
capacities; SERGEANT MADDOX, sued in his
individual and official capacities; SERGEANT
BANKS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; R. D. BOYERS, sued in his
individual and official capacities; M. PETERS,
sued in his individual and official
capacities; P. MASSIE, sued in his individual
and official capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER
HARLOW, sued in his individual and official
capacities; V. S. GRAY, a/k/a S. Gray, sued in
his individual and official capacities; T. A.
MARTIN, sued in his individual and official
capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER NEWCOMBS,
sued in his individual and official
capacities; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CASH, sued in
his individual and official capacities;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ENURIAN, sued in his
individual and official capacities;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MAUZY, sued in his
individual and official capacities; R. F.
WILSON, sued in his individual and official
capacities; R. A. YOUNG, sued in his
individual and official capacities; L. W.
JARVIS, sued in his individual and official
capacities; P. E. MADDOX, sued in his
individual and official capacities; V. J.
BANDY, sued in his individual and official
capacities; K. A. POLINSKY, sued in his
individual and official capacities; CLARENCE
A. HOLLAR, sued in his individual and official
capacities; R. S. JACKSON, sued in his
individual and official capacities;
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER PIRES, sued in his
- 2 -
individual and official capacities; L.
DAVENPORT,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Intervenor.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District
Judge. (7:01-cv-01008-jct)
Submitted: January 17, 2007 Decided: August 17, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shaka Zulu Acoolla, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent,
Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Shaka Zulu Acoolla appeals the district court’s order
granting relief to the defendants and dismissing his claims under
the First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and
Institutionalized Persons Act. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Acoolla v. Angelone, No. 7:01-
cv-01008-jct (W.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 4 -