Nealy v. United States

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6933 ROBERT LEE NEALY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden at FCI Edgefield, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (8:05-cv-02933-RBH) Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 25, 2007 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Lee Nealy, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Robert Lee Nealy appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nealy v. United States, No. 8:05-cv-2933-RBH, 2007 WL 1290262 (D.S.C. Apr. 30, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -