Legal Research AI

Young v. Barthlow

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date filed: 2008-02-27
Citations: 267 F. App'x 250
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
                             UNPUBLISHED

                    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT


                             No. 08-6003



CLAYTON E. YOUNG,

                Plaintiff - Appellant,

          v.


STEPHANIE BARTHLOW, Facility Administrator; JACK CRAGWAY,
Warden; SALLY DAVIS, Head Case Manager; DENNIS LAGENTRY, Case
Manager; TERESA LAVIANO, Case Manager,

                Defendants - Appellees.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-cv-
00662-RWT)


Submitted:   February 21, 2008            Decided:   February 27, 2008


Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior
Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Clayton E. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:

            Clayton E. Young appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to defendants on his complaint that

alleged violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42

U.S.C. § 12101 (2000), and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 504

(2000).    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court.    Young v. Barthlow, No. 8:07-cv-00662-RWT (D. Md. Nov. 7,

2007).    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.



                                                           AFFIRMED




                                - 2 -