United States v. Haynes

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-7129 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LINO H. HAYNES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:90-cr-00105-HCM) Submitted: June 30, 2008 Decided: July 14, 2008 Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lino H. Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Lino H. Haynes appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion and denying reconsideration of its May 11, 2004 order granting in part and denying in part his Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Haynes, No. 2:90-cr-00105-HCM (E.D. Va. filed July 9, 2007; entered July 12, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED - 2 -