UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7066
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RICHARD LAMONT LIGHTY, a/k/a Black, a/k/a Young, a/k/a
Richard Dock, a/k/a Bro, a/k/a Richard Duck, a/k/a Melvin,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:04-cr-00072-sgw-1)
Submitted: October 14, 2008 Decided: October 20, 2008
Before KING, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Lamont Lighty, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Lin Eckert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Richard Lamont Lighty appeals the district court’s
orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2000) motion and his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lighty,
No. 7:04-cr-00072-sgw-1 (W.D. Va. May 23, 2008; June 13, 2008).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2