UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1925
CHARLES W. PENLAND, Sr.; MARY PENLAND, Wife,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF SPARTANBURG, South Carolina; STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA; JERRY SAAD, Court Appointed Receiver; RMC OFFICE
OF SPARTANBURG COUNTY, South Carolina; SOUTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:07-cv-03288-HMH)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Charles W. Penland, Sr., and Mary Penland appeal the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Penland v. County of Spartanburg, No. 6:07-
cv-03288-HMH (D.S.C. Aug. 13, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2