UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2019
RAMONA ORTIZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES E. POTTER, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES POSTAL
SERVICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01073-RAJ-TAJ)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ramona Ortiz, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine DeRoever Wood,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Ramona Ortiz appeals the district court’s order
denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of
its previous order granting Defendants summary judgment on her
employment discrimination claims. * We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Ortiz v. Potter, No. 1:07-cv-01073-
RAJ-TAJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
On appeal, Ortiz attempts to challenge the order of the
district court granting Defendants summary judgment on her
substantive claims. However, we lack jurisdiction to consider
that decision because Ortiz filed her motion for reconsideration
more than ten days after the summary judgment order was entered,
and thus did not extend the period for appealing that order.
See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Bowles v. Russell, 127 S. Ct. 2360,
2366 (2007). Accordingly, only the order denying
reconsideration is currently before this court.
2