UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2357
WANDA SCOTT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ABBEVILLE COUNTY; CITY OF
ABBEVILLE; ABBEVILLE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; ABBEVILLE
COUNTY JAIL; TOMMY HITE, Hite Law Firm; MARION JOHNSON,
Deputy Sheriff; DON MORRIS, Deputy Sheriff; CHARLES GOODWIN,
Sheriff; DAVID BEASLEY, former Governor of South Carolina;
KELLY LOWE, Prosecutor; ANDREW HODGES, Prosecutor; FRANK
ADDEY, Family Court Prosecutor; JOHN SCHRIER, Police
Officer; ROBIN RUCKER, Chief of Police; EVE WILSON,
Abbeville County DSS; ABBEVILLE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT; ANNA
PADGENT, GAL Program; STATE OF ALABAMA, Governor’s Office;
RUCKER, Family Court Judge; GREENWOOD SOLICITOR, Office
Prosecutors; COUNTY OF ABBEVILLE FAMILY COURT; SOUTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION; ERIC MCCOY,
of Governor’s Extradition Office; JOHN DOE, of Governor’s
Extradition Office; CSX RAILROAD; ISOLYSER CO., of Norcross
Georgia; KAREN CREECH, Attorney; COVINGTON PATRICK HAGIN
STEIN & LEWIS; TIMOTHY WOOLSTON, Prosecutor,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
GWD PROSECUTORS; TOMMY FERGUSON, Abbeville County
Magistrate; JAILER TRISH; WYATT SAUNDERS, Family Court
Judge; TIM THOMAS; TOWNES JONES, Solicitor; LADONA JOHNSON;
COUNTY OF CALHOUN; DAVID FORRESTER, Deputy,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:08-cv-00932-GRA)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wanda Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Scott v. South Carolina, No. 8:08-cv-00932-GRA (D.S.C. Nov. 7,
2008). We deny Scott’s motions to order additional case files
and to consolidate. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3