Bearden v. Potter

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1284 RUSSELL J. BEARDEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00864-JCC-TCB) Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Russell J. Bearden, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Russell J. Bearden appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellee’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing Bearden’s complaint brought pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq. (2006), and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bearden v. Potter, No. 1:08-cv-00864-JCC-TCB (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2