UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-2394
MUHAMMAD NAEEM KHAN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: July 29, 2009 Decided: August 14, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey B. Steinfeld, REM ZELLER LAW GROUP, Hackensack, New
Jersey, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General,
William C. Peachey, Assistant Director, Brianne Whelan Cohen,
Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Muhammad Naeem Khan, a native and citizen of Pakistan,
petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals (“Board”) upholding the immigration judge’s denial of
his motion for a continuance and denying his motion to remand.
We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion.
See Lendo v. Gonzales, 493 F.3d 439, 441 (4th Cir. 2007)
(setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion for
a continuance); Onyeme v. INS, 146 F.3d 227, 234 (4th Cir. 1998)
(setting forth standard of review for the denial of a motion to
remand). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review
substantially for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re
Khan (B.I.A. Nov. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Khan v. Holder
Combined Opinion