UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1407
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; BRUCE C. VLADECK, Administrator,
Department of Health and Human Services (Washington) Health
Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (Baltimore); DAVE
BARRAIN, Administrator, United States General Services
Administration; FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE; STEVE PELOVITZ,
Health Care Financing Administration; REGINA MCPHILLIPS,
Health Care Financing Administration; ROBERT MOORE, Health
Care Financing Administration; JOE HLADKY, Health Care
Financing Administration; WINSTON EDWARDS, Health Care
Financing Administration; FRANK JONES, Health Care Financing
Administration; JANICE SIEBERT, Health Care Financing
Administration; PATRICIA WALDRON, Health Care Financing
Administration; MEL GENT, Health Care Financing
Administration; ARNIE KAHN, Health Care Financing
Administration; KERMIT LEE, Health Care Financing
Administration; GEORGE WILSON, Health Care Financing
Administration; DAVID ZANARDELLI, Health Care Financing
Administration; DAVID SMITH, Health Care Financing
Administration; ALAN ZENDELL, Health Care Financing
Administration; RODDERICK LOCKLEAR, Health Care Financing
Administration; JOANNE HITCHCOCK, Health Care Financing
Administration; MAURICE GRAHAM, Special Agent, General
Services Administration; RONALD REJA, Special Agent, General
Services Administration,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:97-cv-02448-WDQ)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm. Wilder's request for rehearing and motion for
appointment of counsel are denied. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3