UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7156
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
RODRICKA JERMAINE GAMBRELL,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:06-cr-01094-GRA)
Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 27, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rodricka Jermaine Gambrell, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B.
Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rodricka Jermaine Gambrell appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence
filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have
reviewed the record and find the district court did not abuse
its discretion in denying the motion. See United States v.
Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion under
§ 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district court”);
United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir. 2000).
Thus, we affirm the district court’s order for the reasons
stated there. See United States v. Gambrell, No. 6:06-cr-01094-
GRA (D.S.C. June 5, 2009). Further, we deny Gambrell’s motion
for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2