UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7792
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RANDOLF MOORE, a/k/a Randy, a/k/a Booney,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:95-cr-00041-H-7)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randolf Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Randolf Moore appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the district court’s previous
order denying his motion to supplement. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Moore, No. 4:95-cr-00041-H-7 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 6, 2009). We deny
Moore’s motion for transcript at government expense, and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2