Jarvis v. Enterprise Fleet Services

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-1835 DEREK JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. No. 09-1953 DEREK JARVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ENTERPRISE FLEET SERVICES AND LEASING COMPANY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Charles B. Day, Magistrate Judge. (8:07-cv-03385-DKC) Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Edward Lee Isler, Michelle Bodley Radcliffe, ISLER, DARE, RAY, RADCLIFFE & CONNOLLY, PC, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Derek Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s paperless orders denying his motions to stay and to recuse the magistrate judge and the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for sanctions related to Defendant’s motion to compel discovery. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Jarvis seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 3