UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7989
TERRY THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY WESTFALL, Medical Director for Correctional Medical
Services; DAVID MILLER, Physician Assistant; CORRECTIONAL
MEDICAL SERVICES; JAMES RUBENSTEIN; DAVID BALLARD, Warden,
Mount Olive Correctional Complex; JANE DOE; JOHN DOE,
Unknown defendants who are the agents for Correctional
Medical Services, The Division of Corrections, ACA, and the
Medical Board Accreditation; WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.;
NAOMI ROBERTS, Medical Administrator for Wexford Medical
Services at Mount Olive Correctional Complex; JOHN DOE,
Unknown agents of Wexford Medical Services. Each Defendant
is sued in his or her own personal capacity, and in their
official, for injunctive relief,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. David A. Faber,
Senior District Judge. (2:08-cv-00126)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Terry Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph M. Farrell, Jr.,
FARRELL, FARRELL & FARRELL, PLLC, Huntington, West Virginia;
Dwayne Edward Cyrus, Jason Eric Wandling, SHUMAN, MCCUSKEY &
SLICER, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia; Philip Cameron Petty,
ROSE PADDEN & PETTY, LC, Fairmont, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Terry Thomas seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate
judge and dismissing some, but not all, named Defendants from
Thomas’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Thomas seeks
to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable
interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3