Richardson v. South Carolina Dept. of Corrections

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 09-7916 CURTIS DALE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution, Individual and official capacity; HIPP, Lieutenant, Individual and official capacity; EVANS CONTROL TRANSPORTATION AND CLASSIFICATION DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL, Individual and official capacities, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:08-cv-02596-RBH) Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Dale Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Heath McAlvin Stewart, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Curtis Dale Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 4:08-cv-02596-RBH (D.S.C. Oct. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2