respondents' motion to dismiss.' Appellant's NRCP 60(b) motion failed,
however, to provide any argument or additional factual allegations that
could have served as a basis for meeting the $10,000 jurisdictional
threshold. 2 Consequently, the district court was within its discretion to
deny appellant's NRCP 60(b) motion, and we therefore
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
Hardesty
Parraguirr
J.
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge
Francis James Johnson
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
'Appellant acknowledges that he received a copy of respondents'
motion to dismiss and that he did not file a written opposition to the
motion.
2 Appellant's proper person appeal statement likewise fails to do so.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
16111WEEMMEMIIIIFIENMENINSII .,..,31,7744f5111A7,