and the district court was obligated to dismiss the action pursuant to clear
authority. Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197-98, 179 P.3d at 558-59.
Having considered the petition, we conclude that petitioners
have not demonstrated that the district court was required to strike the
complaint and dismiss the action below.' See id.; Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88
P.3d at 844. Accordingly, we deny the petition. See NRAP 21(b)(1);
Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851.
It is so ORDERED.
J.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
OVA J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
Sarah A. Smith
Law Firm of Rene L. Rosich, Ltd.
Eighth District Court Clerk
'In light of this conclusion, we need not address real party in
interest's procedural arguments.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
II I efitTAXS-Flf,' -