Oliver (Terrance) v. State C/W 62031

statutory good time and 150 days for work or study pursuant to NRS 209.4465, and 540 days for participation in programs pursuant to NRS 209.449. Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying the petition because appellant failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to any additional credits and failed to demonstrate a violation of a constitutional right. See NRS 209.4465; NRS 209.449. Docket No. 62031 In his motion filed on August 14, 2012, appellant claimed that he should have received 2,128, rather than 835, days of presentence credit for time served because that was the amount credited to his concurrent sentence in a later case. Appellant failed to demonstrate that the district court relied on mistaken assumptions regarding his criminal record that worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Appellant also failed to demonstrate that his sentence was facially illegal or that the district court lacked jurisdiction. See id. We therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgments of the district court AFFIRMED. J. Hardesty J. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) I947A cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge Terrance L. Oliver Attorney General/Las Vegas Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A