Perreira (Nathan) v. State C/W 61575

(2) his competency was not evaluated prior to the entry of his pleas. We disagree with Perreira's contention. "This court will not reverse a district court's determination concerning the validity of a plea absent a clear abuse of discretion." Johnson v. State, 123 Nev. 139, 144, 159 P.3d 1096, 1098 (2007). Perriera failed to either provide a substantial reason which required the withdrawal of his guilty pleas, see Woods v. State, 114 Nev. 468, 475, 958 P.2d 91, 95 (1998), or satisfy his burden and prove that his pleas were invalid, see Molina v. State, 120 Nev. 185, 190, 87 P.3d 533, 537 (2004). We also note that Perreira did, in fact, receive the sentence the parties agreed to recommend pursuant to the written plea agreement: he was adjudicated as a "small" habitual criminal pursuant to NRS 207.010(1)(a) and sentenced to serve two concurrent prison terms of 60-150 months. We conclude that the district courts did not abuse their discretion by denying Perreira's motions and he is not entitled to relief. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgmpitsipf conviction AFFIRMED. 2 J. Douglas Saitta 2Although we filed Perreira's fast track statement, it fails to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. The brief does not contain margins in compliance with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4). Counsel for Perreira is cautioned that the failure to comply with the briefing requirements in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n). SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2 cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Lee A. Gates, Senior Judge Jerome T. Tao, District Judge Patti, Sgro & Lewis Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A