State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1 P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district
court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.
To the extent that appellant sought to modify his sentence,
appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel was outside the scope
of claims permissible in a motion to modify sentence. See Edwards v.
State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Therefore, the district
court did not err in denying this portion of the motion.
Having concluded that appellant is not entitled to relief, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
J.
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge
Juan Fernando Lopez
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A 4'1