Tidmarsh v. Nye Co.

An unpub|ishlld order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123. SuPREME CouRT oF NEvAoA (0; 1947A .IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA WILLIAM TIDMARSH, No. 60957 Appellant, b vs. NYE coUNTY; NYE coUNTY LAW § § gm § ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION; AND MAY 1 3 2013 MR. WALTER F. KAUFMAN, ARBITRATGR, cLEizRAC'E K'PL§%DEM§:')"L)RT Respondents. F\' ORDER DISMISSING `APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order dismissing a petition for judicial review in an employment matter. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Kimberly A. Wanker, Judge. Our review of the record on appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant filed an NRCP 59 tolling motion before filing his notice of appeal. See NRAP 4(a)(4)(D). As that motion has not been resolved by the district court, appellant’s notice of appeal is premature. NRAP 4(a)(6). Therefore, because we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. Douglas cc: Hon. Kimberly A. Wanker, District Judge William Tidmarsh Nye County District Attorney Nye County Clerk 1b ~ /407!,)