Rowe-Gralnick v. Dist. Ct. (Gralnick)

free to reconsider the issue. Div. of Child & Family Servs., Dep't of Human Res., State of Nevada v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. 1 J. Douglas c- JAI J. Saitta cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Gerald Hardcastle, Senior Judge Abrams Law Firm, LLC Moran Law Firm, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk 'This order does not prevent petitioner from challenging any order holding her, her attorney, or her attorney's law firm in contempt by further writ petition. Emerson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 127 Nev. 263 P.3d 224, 227 (2011) (explaining that consideration of a writ petition challenging an order sanctioning a party's attorney is proper because the attorney was not a party to the litigation and therefore the attorney cannot appeal and has no other remedy available at law); Div. of Child & Family Servs., 120 Nev. at 449-50, 92 P.3d at 1242 (holding that the proper way to challenge a contempt order is through a writ petition). 2