available, however, when the petitioner has a plain, speedy, and adequate
remedy at law. See NRS 34.170; Int'l Game Tech., 124 Nev. at 197, 179
P.3d at 558. Generally, an appeal is an adequate legal remedy precluding
writ relief. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d
840, 841 (2004).
Petitioners, to the extent that they are aggrieved from the
district court's final judgment, will have a speedy and adequate remedy at
law in the form of an appeal. Accordingly, we deny the petition. NRAP
21(b); see Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818
P.2d 849, 851 (1991) ("[T]he issuance of a writ of mandamus or prohibition
is purely discretionary with this court."). We further deny as moot
petitioners' April 22, 2013, motion for a stay of the district court
proceedings.
It is so ORDERED.
Gibbons
Parra guirre
-
J.
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge
Law Office of Daniel Marks
Andy J. Kay
Cremen Law Offices
Matthew L. Johnson & Associates
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) (947A
Twin-Vest v. Dist. Ct. (Precision Crushing & Rock Products)
Combined Opinion