concurrently with one another. Instead, the district court imposed two
consecutive sentences of 4 to 20 years.
Based upon our review of the record on appeal, we conclude
that the district court did not err in rejecting this good cause argument.
The underlying factual basis of appellant's claim is incorrect as two
consecutive terms of 4 to 20 years complied with the agreement that the
maximum minimum sentence not exceed 8 years. The plea negotiations
did not include a promise of concurrent sentences. The guilty plea
agreement specifically informed appellant that the decision to impose
consecutive sentences was within the discretion of the district court.
Appellant's two consecutive minimum terms of 4 years complies with the
plea agreement. Regardless of the alleged language barrier, the factual
basis for the good cause argument lacked merit. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2
J.
Hardesty
P arra gu irre
We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
2
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
• -• • • ._ •- ••- , • • • • . , I .p-i;"d•1•7:,'.
cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge
Reynaldo Tapia-Vega
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A
ati=;,Rxre.,1