compliance with the procedural requirements set forth in NRS chapter 34.
See Griffin v. State, 122 Nev. 737, 744, 137 P.3d 1165, 1169 (2006). Even
assuming that appellant's use of the wrong vehicle could be overlooked,
appellant's claim for additional presentence credit lacked merit because
the time spent incarcerated after the sentencing hearing but before entry
of the judgment of conviction is already credited as flat time against the
sentence as the prison begins to calculate a sentence from the sentencing
date. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
L°71 J.
Hardesty
P e..4.0k
Parraguirre
J.
J.
cc: Hon. Abbi Silver, District Judge
Andres Hernandez Mendoza
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) I947A
- -• .7 - I,7-7• 7; 11