suffer prejudice from the delay. Hart v. State, 116 Nev. 558, 563-64, 1
P.3d 969, 972 (2000). Therefore, the district court did not err in denying
appellant's motion. 3 Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4
Aed-A J.
Hardesty
pc
Parraguirre
J.
J.
cc: Hon. David B. Barker, District Judge
Eddie Bell
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
...continued
2007); Bell v. State, Docket No. 59158 (Order of Affirmance, March 7,
2012).
3 Weconclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in
denying appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel.
4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in
proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude
that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent
that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those
submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings
below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A