denying appellant visitation unless respondent permits it, until she
demonstrated compliance with requirements related to mental health
issues. We therefore affirm the district court's custody determinations.
As to spousal support, this court reviews the district court's
support order for an abuse of discretion. See Wolff v. Wolff, 112 Nev.
1355, 1359, 929 P.2d 916, 918-19 (1996). The district court may award
such support as appears just and equitable. NRS 125.150(1)(a). Based on
our review of appellant's appeal statement and the record, we affirm the
district court's spousal support award. Appellant has not demonstrated
any abuse of discretion by the district court; she only argues that she
should have been awarded more support, without providing any argument
as to why the district court's award was improper. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
Gibbons
J.
' J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Egan K. Walker, District Judge
'We have considered appellant's remaining arguments on appeal
and conclude that they lack merit. We deny any other pending requests
for relief as moot.
2
II
Lauren Hacker
Michael Pucino
Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0) 1947A