Hacker v. Pucino

denying appellant visitation unless respondent permits it, until she demonstrated compliance with requirements related to mental health issues. We therefore affirm the district court's custody determinations. As to spousal support, this court reviews the district court's support order for an abuse of discretion. See Wolff v. Wolff, 112 Nev. 1355, 1359, 929 P.2d 916, 918-19 (1996). The district court may award such support as appears just and equitable. NRS 125.150(1)(a). Based on our review of appellant's appeal statement and the record, we affirm the district court's spousal support award. Appellant has not demonstrated any abuse of discretion by the district court; she only argues that she should have been awarded more support, without providing any argument as to why the district court's award was improper. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' Gibbons J. ' J. Saitta cc: Hon. Egan K. Walker, District Judge 'We have considered appellant's remaining arguments on appeal and conclude that they lack merit. We deny any other pending requests for relief as moot. 2 II Lauren Hacker Michael Pucino Washoe District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A