NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
EOLAS TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF
CALIFORNIA,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
AMAZON.COM, INC., AND YAHOO! INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
GOOGLE INC., AND YOUTUBE, LLC,
Defendants-Appellees,
AND
J.C. PENNEY CORPORATION, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
______________________
2012-1632
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 09-CV-0446, Chief Judge
Leonard Davis.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MIKE MCKOOL JR., McKool Smith, P.C., of Dallas,
Texas, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the
brief were DOUGLAS A. CAWLEY, of Dallas, Texas, and
KEVIN L. BURGESS, JOHN B. CAMPBELL and JOEL L.
THOLLANDER, of Austin, Texas.
DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, of Wash-
ington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on
the brief was ADAM CONRAD, for all defendants-appellees.
Of counsel on the brief were DOUGLAS E. LUMISH, Kaso-
witz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP, of Redwood
Shores, California, for defendants-appellees, Google Inc.,
et al.; DIANE K. LETTELLEIR, J.C. Penney Corporation,
Inc., Plano, Texas, for defendant-appellee for J.C. Penney
Corporation, Inc.; EDWARD R. REINES, Weil, Gotshal &
Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, California, and
JENNIFER H. DOAN, Haltom & Doan, of Texarkana, Texas,
for defendants-appellees Amazon.com, Inc., et al.; KEVIN
T. KRAMER, Yahoo! Inc., of Sunnyvale, California, for
defendant-appellee, Yahoo! Inc.; and JEFFREY H. DEAN,
Amazon.com, Inc., of Seattle, Washington, for defendant-
appellee, Amazon.com, Inc.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit
Judges).
3
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
July 22, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk