outlined in NRS 125.150(8) in making the award. See Wolff v. Wolff, 112
Nev. 1355, 1359, 929 P.2d 916, 918-19 (1996) (providing that this court
will not disturb a district court's disposition of community property or an
alimony award absent an abuse of discretion); see also NRS 125.150(8)
(providing factors for a district court to consider when awarding spousal
support). Finally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in assigning the tax debts to appellant, as appellant failed to
comply with the court's order to provide tax returns demonstrating that
the tax debt at issue here was a community debt. See Wolff, 112 Nev. at
1359, 929 P.2d at 918-19. Accordingly, in light of these determinations,
and as appellants remaining arguments lack merit, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
, J.
Hardesty
Parraguirre
Cherry
cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division
Nathaniel Tolliver
Cassandra Renee Tolliver
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A
MENZUM5114011111111111M
7-