circumstances had changed to the extent that a reduction in his alimony
obligation was warranted. Accordingly, we
ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.'
J.
Hardesty
pc„
Parv.guirre
J.
erry
cc: Hon. Bill Henderson, District Judge, Family Court Division
Michael A. Carvatta
Venesa Mascolino
Eighth District Court Clerk
'To the extent that appellant sought to challenge the district court's
May 5, 2010, order under NRCP 60(b) based on inadvertence, the district
court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion, as it was
untimely. See NRCP 60(b) (providing that motions for relief from
judgment based on inadvertence must be filed within six months after
service of the notice of entry of the order). Additionally, we have
considered appellant's remaining arguments and conclude that they lack
merit.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A