UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6716
GARY BUTERRA WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT FOR CITY OF SUFFOLK,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 13-6718
GARY WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SUFFOLK CIRCUIT COURT,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
COMMONWEALTH,
Defendant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:11-cv-00125-HEH; 3:12-cv-00078-HEH)
Submitted: July 25, 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013
Before GREGORY, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary Buterra Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary Buterra Williams appeals the district court’s
orders remanding his state prosecutions to state court and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motions. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we
grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Circuit Court
for City of Suffolk, No. 3:11-cv-00125-HEH (E.D. Va. Apr. 29,
2012; Williams v. Suffolk Circuit Court, No. 3:12-cv-00078-HEH
(E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2012 & Apr. 29, 2013). We also deny Williams’
motion for leave to file a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in the
district court. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Gary Williams v. Circuit Court
Combined Opinion