United States v. Agustin Acevedo-Vasquez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 02 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10166 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-04035-JGZ v. MEMORANDUM * AGUSTIN ACEVEDO-VAZQUEZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona David S. Doty, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted July 24, 2013 *** Before: ALARCÓN, CLIFTON, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges. Agustin Acevedo-Vazquez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry after * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The Honorable David S. Doty, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation. *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Acevedo-Vazquez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Acevedo-Vazquez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Acevedo-Vazquez has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 12-10166