United States v. Raymond Archie Boyd, Jr.

Case: 12-15685 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15685 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00025-GKS-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND ARCHIE BOYD, JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (August 5, 2013) Case: 12-15685 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: James W. Smith, III, appointed counsel for Raymond Boyd, Jr., in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Boyd’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED. 1 1 We have conducted our review without applying the appeal waiver in the plea agreement because the district court failed to sufficiently discuss the waiver with Boyd at the change of plea hearing. See, e.g., United States v. Johnson, 541 F.3d 1064, 1066 (11th Cir. 2008). 2