UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1354
GENNADIY KARP; TAMILLA HUMBAT GIZI HASANOVA,
Petitioners,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted: July 29, 2013 Decided: August 8, 2013
Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition dismissed in part, and denied in part by unpublished
per curiam opinion.
Gennadiy Karp, Tamilla Humbat Gizi Hasanova, Petitioners Pro Se.
Lindsay Corliss, Nicole N. Murley, William Charles Peachey,
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for
Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Gennadiy Karp, a native of Moldova and a citizen of
Azerbaijan, and his wife, Tamilla Humbat Gizi Hasanova, a native
and citizen of Azerbaijan, petition for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying their motion to
reconsider and reopen. We have reviewed the administrative
record and Petitioners’ contentions, and conclude that we lack
jurisdiction over the claims challenging prior Board orders from
which Petitioners failed to file a timely petition for review.
See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995). Accordingly, we
dismiss the petition for review in part with respect to those
claims. Next, after reviewing Petitioners’ claims relative to
the instant order under review, we conclude that the Board did
not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reopen and
reconsider. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013). We therefore deny
the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the
Board. See In re: Karp, (B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2013). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED IN PART,
AND DENIED IN PART
2