United States v. Michael Cottrell

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 21 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 11-30332 12-30103 Plaintiff - Appellee, 12-30227 v. D.C. No. 3:07-cr-00207-KI MICHAEL THOMAS COTTRELL, a.k.a. Michael Thomas Ellis, a.k.a. James Fuller, a.k.a. William Paynter, a.k.a. Ronald William Reddy, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Garr M. King, District Judge, Presiding Submitted August 14, 2013 ** Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges. In these consolidated appeals, Michael Thomas Cottrell appeals from the district court’s orders revoking supervised release and the sentences imposed upon * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cottrell’s counsel has filed briefs stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with motions to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cottrell the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. A review of the record indicates that these appeals are moot because Cottrell has completed his custodial sentences and he is no longer serving a term of supervised release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 13-14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999). We accordingly dismiss these appeals. Counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 11-30332 & 12-30103 & 12-30227