UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-6262
EDWARD LEE LEWIS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; TERRY O'BRIEN; UNKNOWN JOHN DOE
ASSOCIATE WARDENS; CAPTAIN BERGAMI; SIA PETRISCO; SIS
SERANO; SIS LIEUTENANT FISHER; JOHN AND JANE DOE SIS STAFF;
D-UNIT MANAGER MORI; D-UNIT MANAGER WITT; SHU LIEUTENANT
HUFFMAN; SHU LIEUTENANT BRENSON; JOHN AND JANE DOE SHU
STAFF; P. A. AZUMA; DOCTOR DUBERSAC; MEDICAL STAFF MS.
BROWN-STOBBY; JOHN AND JANE DOE MEDICAL STAFF; JOHN AND
JANE DOE CORRECTIONAL STAFF,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ACTING WARDEN, from 8/5/10 to 10/12/10; SPECIAL HOUSING
UNIT LIEUTENANTS, from 6/3/10 to 10/12/10; SJS STAFF,
through 6/3/10 to 10/12/10; SPECIAL HOUSING STAFF, 6/3/10
to 10/12/10; ACTING D-2 UNIT, from 6/3/10 to 10/12/10;
WARDEN MARTINEZ; LIEUTENANT MARR; 3 JOHN AND JANE DOE R&D
OFFICERS AT USP-ALLENWOOD,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00054-JPB-JSK)
Submitted: July 11, 2013 Decided: September 6, 2013
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Lee Lewis, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lee Lewis appeals the district court’s orders:
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971);
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Lewis v. Federal
Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:11-cv-00054-JPB-JSK (N.D. W. Va. Feb.
20, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3