United States v. Ismael Robles-Perez

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION SEP 10 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-30330 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00280-HA v. MEMORANDUM* ISMAEL ROBLES-PEREZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ancer L. Haggerty, District Judge, Presiding Submitted July 30, 2013** Before: HUG, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. Ismael Robles-Perez appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 48-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Robles-Perez contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of his psychological condition. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Robles-Perez’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The 48-month sentence, well below the uncontested Guidelines range of 77 to 96 months, is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including Robles-Lopez’s extensive criminal history and five prior deportations. See id. AFFIRMED. 2 12-30330