Legal Research AI

Mondis Technology Ltd. v. Innolux Corporation

Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date filed: 2013-09-13
Citations:
Copy Citations
Click to Find Citing Cases
Combined Opinion
       NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


  United States Court of Appeals
      for the Federal Circuit
                ______________________

           MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD.,
                Plaintiff-Appellee,

                           v.

  INNOLUX CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS
   CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION) AND INNOLUX
                    CORP.,
                   Defendants,

                          AND

   HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.,
              Movant-Appellant.
            ______________________

                      2013-1178
                ______________________

   Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0378, Judge J.
Rodney Gilstrap.
                 ______________________

                     JUDGMENT
                ______________________

   MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him
on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and VINCENT A.
GALLO.

    PETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles,
California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the
brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, and JAY C.
CHIU.
                 ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:



   PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
           AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

                      ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT



September 13, 2013         /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
     Date                      Daniel E. O’Toole
                               Clerk