Quinonez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

district court considered this argument and did not clearly err when it concluded that Wells Fargo's failure to immediately correct did not amount to bad faith. Edelstein, 128 Nev. at , 286 P.3d at 260 (indicating that, absent clear error, a district court's factual determinations will not be disturbed). Appellants next contend that Wells Fargo failed to comply with the FMP's document production requirements by providing a deficient broker's price opinion (BPO). The district court did not clearly err when it found that the signed BPO, accompanied by the unsigned supplement, satisfied the FMP's requirements regarding production of a BPO. Id. Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. Saitta cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Mark L. Mausert Tiffany & Bosco, P. A. Washoe District Court Clerk 2