UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-7095
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT, a/k/a Snoop, a/k/a Ray,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:05-cr-01044-RBH-1; 4:11-cv-02488-RBH)
Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 27, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina;
Arthur Bradley Parham, Assistant United States Attorney,
Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Chestnut appeals from the district court’s
order denying his motion for an extension of time to note his
appeal from the order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West Supp. 2013) motion. Because Chestnut failed to file the
motion for an extension of the appeal period within the time
allowed under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), the district court
properly denied the motion. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Chestnut’s motions for
a copy of the Federal Rules of Criminal and Civil Procedure, for
appointment of counsel, and for bail or release pending appeal
are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED
2