Christopher v. Peel & Brimley

litigation create a consumer or business relationship with the opposing attorney. See NRS 598.0903 et seq. Appellants' negligence per se claims fail because an attorney does not have a duty stemming from his client's violation of contractor disciplinary statutes. See NRS 624.301 et seq. Likewise, appellants' nuisance claims fail because an attorney prosecuting a valid mechanics' lien is not a nuisance. See Sowers v. Forest Hills Subdivision, 129 Nev. „ 294 P.3d 427, 432 (2013). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.' J. cc: Hon. Elizabeth Goff Gonzalez, District Judge Palmer Christopher Paul Christopher Gordon & Rees, LLP Peel Brimley LLP/Henderson Eighth District Court Clerk 'We have considered appellants' other arguments on appeal and conclude that they lack merit. Respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. 2