United States v. Tereso Garcia-Cruz

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10566 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00902-FJM v. MEMORANDUM * TERESO GARCIA-CRUZ, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 24, 2013 ** Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Tereso Garcia-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 68-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia-Cruz’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Garcia-Cruz the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 12-10566