United States v. Noe Reza-Guerrero

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-10540 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 4:11-cr-01767-DCB v. MEMORANDUM * NOE REZA-GUERRERO, a.k.a. Noe Reza Guerrero, a.k.a. Noe Guerrero-Reza, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Mark W. Bennett, District Judge, Presiding ** Submitted September 24, 2013 *** Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Noe Reza-Guerrero appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 41-month sentence for reentry after * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. * * The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Reza-Guerrero’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Reza-Guerrero the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. AFFIRMED. 2 12-10540