United States v. Mateo Silvestre-Diego

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 11-50415 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01057-ODW v. MEMORANDUM * MATEO GOMEZ SILVESTRE-DIEGO, a.k.a. El Tigre, a.k.a. Mateo Gomez Silvestre, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Otis D. Wright II, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 24, 2013 ** Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Mateo Gomez Silvestre-Diego appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 96-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to harbor and transport illegal aliens, in violation of 8 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. Silvestre-Diego contends that the district court procedurally erred when it based his sentence on an unsubstantiated assumption regarding the frequency with which he engaged in spousal abuse. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. Any factual error by the district court did not affect the sentence imposed. See United States v. Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir. 2008). AFFIRMED. 2 11-50415