United States v. Anabel Ocegueda

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION OCT 03 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 12-50259 Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:12-cr-00509-CAB v. MEMORANDUM * ANABEL OCEGUEDA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding Submitted September 24, 2013 ** Before: RAWLINSON, N.R. SMITH, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Anabel Ocegueda appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 168-month sentence for importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 960. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ocegueda’s counsel has filed a brief stating that * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Ocegueda the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Ocegueda has waived her right to appeal her conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. DISMISSED. 2 12-50259