Miguel Carrillo v. Eric Holder, Jr.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT OCT 07 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK MIGUEL CARRILLO, No. 12-71179 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS Petitioner, Agency No. A070-915-954 v. MEMORANDUM* ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of The Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted September 11, 2013 ** San Francisco, California Before: ALARCÓN and BERZON, Circuit Judges; and ZOUHARY, District Judge.*** * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. The only claim in his Petition is that Carrillo’s conviction of an aggravated felony was invalid because of ineffective assistance of counsel. That contention “is no longer supportable,” because Chaidez v. United States, __ U.S. ___, 133 S. Ct. 1103 (2013), held Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2009), non-retroactive. Pet’r’s Suppl. Br. at 5. DENIED. 2