IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 96-20085
Summary Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES EDWARD JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. CR-H-95-149-3
- - - - - - - - - -
November 11, 1996
Before JONES, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
James Edward Johnson appeals his convictions for conspiracy
to commit mail and wire fraud, using a fictitious name in
connection with mail fraud, and money laundering and aiding and
abetting in the commission of mail fraud. He contends that the
Government failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was
a knowing participant in the fraudulent telemarketing scheme.
Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-20085
-2-
convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The
evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Johnson
guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Krenning,
93 F.3d 1257, 1265 (5th Cir. 1996).
AFFIRMED.